Ambassador Michael Gfoeller, Founder of The Gfoeller Renaissance Foundation and former U.S. diplomat, analyzes in this interview with Jacob Heilbrunn the major geopolitical consequences of the war in Iran.
According to him, the potential collapse of the Islamic Republic could pave the way for a post-Islamist Iran, deeply transformed by a generational shift and the growing rejection of religious governance.
For Gfoeller, such a development would not concern Iran alone. It could shake Islamist movements across the region, weaken actors such as the Muslim Brotherhood, and reshape strategic dynamics involving Russia, China, and the war in Ukraine.
The former diplomat also believes that this moment could mark a turning point in global military strategy — the era of drones and robotic systems — while reinforcing the international position of the United States.
A Conversation exploring the possible transformations of the Middle East and their implications for the global order.
Michael Gfoeller: “A Post–Islamic Republic Iran Could Reshape the Global Balance”
by
March 2026
Recent Articles
An Intruder Between Abraham and Cyrus
Can the Mecca Pact Reshape the Middle East? The Mecca Joint Defence Agreement between Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and Pakistan has been presented as a historic step toward Muslim collective security. Signed on August 7, 2026, the agreement declares that an armed attack on one member will be regarded as an attack on all three. Yet […]
Demystifying agentic AI
Everyone wants an AI strategy. Almost nobody wants to first figure out whether they need AI at all. A couple of weeks ago, the CEO of a non-profit organization called me. “Esti, you understand AI, right?” Well, no one really understands AI, I told her, but I asked what I could do to help. She […]
China's Plausible Deniability Doctrine in the Middle East
China insists it is a neutral actor in the Middle East. However, recent reports suggesting it is helping Iran rebuild its air defenses tell a very different story. Whether those reports are ultimately confirmed is almost beside the point. The real story lies in the widening gap between Beijing’s diplomatic rhetoric and its strategic behavior. […]
